Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Courtney Elisabeth's avatar

Another fantastic interview! I loved it.

The last several years I've been in a bit of an internal crisis about what makes me a lesbian. As I get older and sex and romance isn't at the forefront as much for me, I wondered what actually makes me a lesbian. I thought maybe it was how I related to women, but that didn't seem to fit right. And then your description of lesbians being the only ones who say no to men fit perfectly. In this conversation, I think Kathleen went straight to sex, but that's not it at all. And I think it's easy to think saying no means decentering men, but that's not it either. For me, I think saying no means not making yourself small and opting out of men’s pretend make believe. Not participating in playing along with whatever men are performing. I think sometimes that involves centering men by giving them your full attention and saying, “no, I'm not going to pretend you're a good father or provider or whatever." Ugh, I meant for this to be more about lesbians than men, but here I am. I think in saying no to men, lesbians get "othered” in society. We opt out of the game and then meet other women who are opting out and there's no denying the potential attraction that blooms in mutual recognition, dare I say attunement.

Okay, if being a lesbian is saying no to men, does that mean our existence lies closer to an aversion or men than romantic attraction to women? I'm genuinely asking because I’ve always wondered for myself.

Their fondness for the character Gloria in your book is interesting. My wife has really turned me on to her favorite stories, West Wing and Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Through the years, our favorite characters and kingdoms have changed as we've grown. I wonder if Gloria is like that. Will I grow to like her as I grow as a person? Or am I forever destined to not understand her because I will never understand having a family like hers?

No posts

Ready for more?